Notice: Due to planned maintenance work, the TU Dortmund websites will be unavailable for short periods of time several times on April 17, 2024 between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your understanding.
To content
Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology

New journal article published in Contemporary Educational Psychology

-
in
  • News
  • Publications
Dunkelgrüner Hintergrund mit weißen Schriftzug Contemporary Educational Psychology und hellgrünen Schriftzug CEP © Elsevier

Benden, D. & Lauermann, F. (2023). Searching for short-term motivational alignment and spillover effects: A random intercept cross-lagged analysis of students’ expectancies and task values in math-intensive study programs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73. Article 102166. doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102166

Why do students’ motivational beliefs decline shortly after the transition to math-intensive STEM programs in higher education? Based on Eccles and Wigfield’s situated expectancy-value theory, the present study addressed this question by examining so-called motivational alignment and spillover processes of students’ course-specific (summative) or week-specific (situated) expectancy-value beliefs in gateway math courses. Random intercept cross-lagged panel models revealed an increasing within-person alignment of students’ course-specific expectancies and intrinsic/utility values across the semester. This alignment was linked to unidirectional spillover effects (i.e., cross-lagged effects) from expectancy to intrinsic/utility values. In contrast, no significant motivational alignment or spillover effects were found for students’ week-specific motivational beliefs at the beginning of the semester. In addition, the motivational alignment was significantly greater for students who failed their math course or dropped out of their math course during the semester compared to those who succeeded. These findings highlight that summative versus situation-specific motivational beliefs may show different developmental processes, that motivational alignment and spillover processes contribute to motivational declines in gateway math courses, and that these processes can indicate a greater disengagement from challenging STEM contexts.